<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New .same() Function, But Is It Useful?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.datejs.com/2008/05/13/new-same-function-but-is-it-useful/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.datejs.com/2008/05/13/new-same-function-but-is-it-useful/</link>
	<description>An open-source JavaScript Date Library</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 22:24:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Kamens</title>
		<link>http://www.datejs.com/2008/05/13/new-same-function-but-is-it-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-520</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Kamens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 01:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datejs.com/2008/05/13/new-same-function-but-is-it-useful/#comment-520</guid>
		<description>Hi,

It looks like the contact form on your contact page is broken, so I&#039;m posting here instead in the hope that you will see this comment.

Are you still maintaining / doing any sort of active development on this code? I&#039;m asking because it&#039;s really quite awesome and I&#039;d like to use it in a Thunderbird add-in I maintain, but there&#039;s one little feature missing... I&#039;d like to be able to say, for example, &quot;8:30 am next weekday&quot; and have &quot;weekday&quot; mean the next day if it is currently Monday through Thursday, or the following Monday if it is currently Saturday or Sunday.

I looked briefly at the code to see if this would be something easy to add, and boy, it&#039;s complicated!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>It looks like the contact form on your contact page is broken, so I&#8217;m posting here instead in the hope that you will see this comment.</p>
<p>Are you still maintaining / doing any sort of active development on this code? I&#8217;m asking because it&#8217;s really quite awesome and I&#8217;d like to use it in a Thunderbird add-in I maintain, but there&#8217;s one little feature missing&#8230; I&#8217;d like to be able to say, for example, &#8220;8:30 am next weekday&#8221; and have &#8220;weekday&#8221; mean the next day if it is currently Monday through Thursday, or the following Monday if it is currently Saturday or Sunday.</p>
<p>I looked briefly at the code to see if this would be something easy to add, and boy, it&#8217;s complicated!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Colburn</title>
		<link>http://www.datejs.com/2008/05/13/new-same-function-but-is-it-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Colburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 17:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datejs.com/2008/05/13/new-same-function-but-is-it-useful/#comment-65</guid>
		<description>It looks like you&#039;re extending the Number class too.  It looked nice till then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like you&#8217;re extending the Number class too.  It looked nice till then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JW</title>
		<link>http://www.datejs.com/2008/05/13/new-same-function-but-is-it-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>JW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 13:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datejs.com/2008/05/13/new-same-function-but-is-it-useful/#comment-64</guid>
		<description>Seems to be very useful to me.

@Mike, because its not only used for days. You can also use d1.same().month(d2) or d1.same.hour(d2) for example, to check whether two event are in the same month (of the same year) or the same hour (of the same day of the same month of the same year) respectively.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to be very useful to me.</p>
<p>@Mike, because its not only used for days. You can also use d1.same().month(d2) or d1.same.hour(d2) for example, to check whether two event are in the same month (of the same year) or the same hour (of the same day of the same month of the same year) respectively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.datejs.com/2008/05/13/new-same-function-but-is-it-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 14:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datejs.com/2008/05/13/new-same-function-but-is-it-useful/#comment-63</guid>
		<description>Why not call it sameDay() or isSameDay()?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not call it sameDay() or isSameDay()?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schalk Neethling</title>
		<link>http://www.datejs.com/2008/05/13/new-same-function-but-is-it-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Schalk Neethling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 13:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datejs.com/2008/05/13/new-same-function-but-is-it-useful/#comment-62</guid>
		<description>I would definitely use it. Great idea!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would definitely use it. Great idea!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.datejs.com/2008/05/13/new-same-function-but-is-it-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 13:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datejs.com/2008/05/13/new-same-function-but-is-it-useful/#comment-61</guid>
		<description>This looks useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Library &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New .same() function, but is it useful?</title>
		<link>http://www.datejs.com/2008/05/13/new-same-function-but-is-it-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Library &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New .same() function, but is it useful?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 02:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datejs.com/2008/05/13/new-same-function-but-is-it-useful/#comment-60</guid>
		<description>[...] geoffrey.mcgill wrote an interesting post today on New .same() function, but is it useful?Here&#8217;s a quick excerptI need some feedback regarding a feature I just added to the library, but I’m struggling to explain/document clearly and I’m not sure if others would find this useful. The new .same() function will compare two date objects to determine &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] geoffrey.mcgill wrote an interesting post today on New .same() function, but is it useful?Here&#8217;s a quick excerptI need some feedback regarding a feature I just added to the library, but I’m struggling to explain/document clearly and I’m not sure if others would find this useful. The new .same() function will compare two date objects to determine &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
